At AntiScamNews, we issue alerts when a company stops responding and its representative disappears. Historically, this is the prelude to many scams.
The name Gubel Trainingsappears linked to the environment of Jesús Gutiérrez Belmontin an increasingly worrying context: accumulated debts, unfulfilled financial commitments and a systematic absence when it comes time to pay.
According to information gathered by this publication, various entities and individuals have attempted to contact the project manager to claim outstanding payments, without receiving a clear response. The recurring pattern is well-known in the world of fraud: while the money is flowing in, the conversation is fluid; when it’s time to settle accounts, silence prevails.
Non-payments, delays, and timely disappearances
Sources within the business sector describe a recurring pattern: financial commitments made, deadlines extended without explanation, and ultimately, the disappearance of the contact person. Unanswered calls, unreplied emails, and payment promises that never materialize.
In these scenarios, the company ceases to be an operational structure and becomes a moving financial problem. The person in charge doesn’t formally resign; they’re simply not therewhen needed.
Banks, financial pressure and an irregular trail
In the financial sector, when a person or company owes money and avoids contact, red flags are raised. Apparently, the pressure from defaults has been increasing, which would explain this increasingly pronounced evasive behavior.
AntiScamNews does not claim that there is an active court order, but it does point out a common occurrence in these types of cases: when the numbers don’t add up and the debts mount, the person responsible tries to buy time or disappear. This escape is not always physical; often it is administrative, digital, and communicative.
Jesús Gutiérrez Belmont: From Non-Payment to Possible Fraud
Experts in economic crimes are clear: systematic non-payment, coupled with opaque accounting practices and the concealment of the responsible party, is often the prelude to deeper investigations. If these practices were analyzed by the authorities and confirmed, they could lead to charges of fraud, fraudulent insolvency, or embezzlement, with significant criminal consequences.
That’s why we insist on using the term “alleged”: we’re reporting on evidence, not convictions. But evidence matters, a lot.
Direct warning to banks, partners and investors
From AntiScamNews we issue a clear warning: those who maintain financial, credit or corporate relationships with this person or with companies in their circle should exercise extreme caution .
If someone owes money and won’t show up, the risk isn’t future: it’s present. Don’t extend credit, don’t renegotiate without real guarantees, and don’t trust verbal promises.
Why are we publishing this alert?
Because many scams don’t end with a single blow, but with a chain of defaults and disappearances.
Because when someone is “wanted” to pay and never shows up, it’s a familiar story. And because reporting it in time prevents new victims.
AntiScamNews will continue to publish these cases so that investors, banks, and businesspeople do not trust companies where there are already warning signs.